Peer-Reviewed Journal Details
Mandatory Fields
Stewart Clegg, Bent Flyvbjerg and Mark Haugaard
Journal Of Political Power
Reflections on phronetic social science
Optional Fields
phronesis; power; truth; domination; critique
Clegg, Flyvbjerg and Haugaard debate the strengths and weaknesses of a Fou- cauldian–Nietzschean critique of power compared to a tradition exemplified by Lukes and Habermas. Flyvbjerg and Clegg argue that the pursuit of universal normative principles and of rationality without power may lead to oppressive utopian thinking. Drawing on the Aristotelian tradition of phronesis, they pro- pose a contextualist form of critique that situates itself in analysis of local prac- tices to render domination transparent and open to change. While Haugaard accepts there cannot be a universal view that transcends the particularities of context, he argues that the phronetic approach is crypto-normative because it implicitly presupposes unacknowledged liberal normative premises; moreover, any use of ‘truth’ as a criterion follows Enlightenment principles of verification. 
Grant Details
Publication Themes