Conference Contribution Details
Mandatory Fields
Paolo Bartoloni
The Creative Investment of Multiculturalism and the Transnational
Discussion on the symbolic expression of multiculturalism and transnationalism
The University of Sydney
Invited Lecture
Optional Fields
<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:auto; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:EN-US;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; font-size:10.0pt; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;} @page WordSection1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --> In multiculturalism, as Michael Cronin has argued, “the community constitutes both the grounds for access to entitlements and the primary framework for self-definition.” (2006) The experience of the transnational is instead characterized by “multiple activities – economic, political, cultural, personal – that require sustained contacts and travel across national borders” (Sara Ahmed et all, 2003: 3) While the community plays a vital and essential role in the context of multiculturalism, individual skills, abilities and knowledge appear to be the essential traits of the transnational. While these two existential conditions and categories seem very different, typifying a historical shift in the definition and self-actuation of identity, they have something in common. They are linked to the experience of uprooting and regrounding, and yet they respond to this same experience in ways and by employing creative processes that are markedly different. After providing a general discussion and definition of multiculturalism, cosmopolitanism and the transnational, I will argue that it is by interrogating the creative process of imaginative and symbolic representation of the experience of uprooting and regrounding that a meaningful and potentially empowering distinction can be made between multiculturalism and the transnational, opening the ways for future engagements and investments in the creative process of in-between agents.
Australasian Centre for Italian Studies
Publication Themes