Conference Contribution Details
Mandatory Fields
Paolo Bartoloni
Meaningful Places, Meaningful Lives
Discussion of place-making and identity
Monash University, Melbourne
Invited Lecture
Optional Fields
<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:auto; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:EN-US;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; font-size:10.0pt; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;} @page WordSection1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --> Starting from a discussion of Sigmund Freudís definition of happiness as the connection between human and world (Civilization and its Discontents), this talk will present a reconsideration of the relation between subject and object by mobilizing an interdisciplinary approach, including philosophy, cultural studies, geography, sociology and literary studies. The hypothesis is that places that are marked by a mutual relation between individuals and things, and in which, therefore, the attention and care practices by individuals is directly related to, determined, and generated by the things and objects therein, are meaningful. As opposed to Speculative Realism and Object-Oriented-Ontology, which argue for a recognition of the singularity or suchness of objects outside of and beyond the representative impulse, I claim that a new post-Kantian understanding of correlationism is essential to make sense of new forms of expression and knowledge, such as transcultural expression. Contrary to some definitions of the transcultural as that which mediates traditions (Held, 2005), Iíd argue that the tanscultural subject is not so much a mediator or a translator as an agent whose primary function is to modify conditions of perception and explore new spaces of knowledge. In this context I wish to seek connections between transculturalism and the condition of creolisation as described, for instance, by Sheller (2003).
Australasian Centre for Italian Studies
Publication Themes