Peer-Reviewed Journal Details
Mandatory Fields
D. Carey
2017
February
Paragraph: A Journal Of Modern Critical Theory
John Locke, Edward Stillingfleet, and the Quarrel over Consensus
Published
()
Optional Fields
Locke, Stillingfleet, republic of letters, common consent, quarrel of the ancients and moderns, Bayle
40
1
61
80
Philosophical antagonism and dispute by no means confined to the early modern period nonetheless enjoyed a moment of particular ferment as new methods and orientations on questions of epistemology and ethics developed in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. John Locke played a key part in them with controversies initiated by the Essay concerning Human Understanding (1690). This essay develops a wider typology of modes of philosophical quarrelling by focusing on a key debate the issue of whether human nature came pre-endowed with innate ideas and principles, resulting in a moral consensus across mankind, or remained, on the contrary, dependent on reason to achieve moral insight, and, in practice, divided by diverse and irreconcilable cultural practices as a result of the force of custom and the limited purchase of reason. The essay ultimately concludes on the idea that we should not only attend to the genealogy of disputes but also to the morphology of disputation as a practice.
0264-8334
Grant Details
Publication Themes